Who says the DV Act is misused? - Instablogs
Who says the DV Act is misused?
Myth K , Bangalore: Oct 4 2009
Made Popular Oct 5 2009
India :

Who says the DV Act is misused?

Day in and Day out, we get to hear so many cases of the women-centric laws being misused. Be it the 498A or the PWDVA (Commonly known as the DV Act), everyone around alleges that these laws are being misused by the legal terrorists to terrorize their husbands and their families and using them as Free ATM Machines.

However, a critical study of this PWDVA law itself, makes me wonder; is this law really being misused at all? Surprised? Let me give you some grounds to think...

-> The act is made to provide relief ONLY to the married women in a domestic setup.

-> It’s one of the only laws that are entirely drafted and finalized by Lawyers, and not the legislation. This seems to me like a lock designed by a team of thiefs; and you expect that lock to be theft-proof.

-> This law defines Domestic Violence as anything that the wife feels as a cruelty towards her. It might include the husband not giving her money for Kitty Party, or even he calling her step brother an idiot.

-> The law provides the wife to accuse anyone in the domestic relationship, including 2 months old baby, 89 years old granny or an 8 months old sister-in-law. And they’ll all be required to run from pillar to post in the Indian Courts for as long as the Complainant or the Judge wants.

-> The complainant under this act can ask for any amount of money from the husband as compensation. There’s no limits to her imagination.

-> The complainant can also ask for a “right to residence” in any house that she might have stayed with her husband, ever. In addition, she can also legally ask all the other residents in that house to evacuate it, on the pretext that she feels threatened by them.

-> The Complainant can file a case under this act at any time of her life, even after 12 years of her divorce from the accused (ex-) husband.

-> There is no penalty whatsoever for the complainant if the filed case is proven to be entirely false.

-> The Supreme Court of India has ruled very clearly that this Act is a Clumsily Drafted Law and so it should be scrapped.

-> This law is also famous as being a clumsy copy of the notorious VAWA law of the US, which is under a lot of criticism already.

-> This law is already declared as unconstitutional by the National Organization “Save Indian Family” in it’s National-level Shimla Meet 2009.

With all the above points about this particular act, don’t you think the law was specifically designed by the Lawyers Collective for the exact purpose to destroy the very fabric of the country?
Now that you know the background about this law, do you still think this law is being misused? I’d say not at all. The PWDVA, 2006 is actually Used properly for achieving it’s exact objective. The objective to destroy India and the Indian Family System, by destroying the very workforce of the country, i.e. the Men and their families.

So when a law is being used exactly as it was designed to be used, would you still call it a misuse? I’d not.

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
Sweta
Gwalior, India
Wow! Wonderful article, clearly showing the other side of the story. And i think the law was purposely made in such a manner to get it abolished hence, forever keeping women as the way men want.
2 Stars
Avadhut
Calicut, India
Oh great! So you mean to say that the law has been used properly as it is meant to be... in a way you are right but then who could make such senseless law, i wonder.
1 Stars
Only Indian Congress Government led by Family-less, arrogant, male-hater women, can be given the credit for this feat!
1 Stars
@Sweta,
Why don’t you too ’Use’ the law as well?
Afterall such barbaric & inhuman laws are indeed made for women like you who live in a dream-land of a male dominated world.

For some education you might read the following:
http://www.wethemen.us/articles/blogs/289-male-dominated-society-really.html

http://www.wethemen.us/articles/blogs/465-is-there-anything-good-about-men.html

http://legalfighter.wordpress.com/2009/02/19/the-real-truth-of-the-myth-called-male-domination/

http://legalfighter.wordpress.com/2009/09/30/violence-against-men-%e2%80%93-the-untold-truth/

And please stop becoming a reason for twice the number of Married Men committing suicide every year (compared to married women).
http://legalfighter.wordpress.com/2009/05/28/cases-of-battering-jump-the-sex-divide/
1 Stars
Sweta
Gwalior, India
No thanks! Its not women like me, but weaker men who have suicidal tendencies who die of depression. People who have suicidal tendencies in them will find one or the other reason to die.

Anyway, thanks for the suggestion but i don't need your law because me and my husband are happily married. Not because i rule him or he rules me but because we both listen to each other and respect each other. We try to handle our relationship with maturity and love and not with greed and complaints.

There's always the other side of the coin. Had men treated women with respect and love in the past, this law wouldn't have evolved. Think with an open mind about this... why women are now going against men, because they have had enough.
1 Stars
ARVIND K.PANDEY
PRAYAG, India
They are not weaker men but men who have been trapped by the shrewdness inherent in woman !!Swetaji,there is also a law for aiding and abetting suicide.If what you say is true then that will mean there is no such thing as ”aiding and abetting” !!

Your stand is irrational and illogical because there are many instances when people are driven to point of death via set of calculative cruel gestures.There is no such thing as weaker men or weaker women.And ,therefore, these women are certainly guilty and can in no way get the benefit of weakness inherent in any individual as depicted by your use of term ”weaker men”.
1 Stars
Alright, taking your useless argument as well...
When so called ’weaker women (married)’ commit suicides, the whole family of the husband is thrown behind bars without even considering the real reason of her suicide.

If the ’weaker men’ do so, then where is the law to punish the woman and her family responsible for driving that man to suicide?
1 Stars
Ha... what a lame and silly excuse of male-hatred...

Just because your great grand father might have done some DV on your great grand mother, so you justify punishing your husband for the same?

I can see how happy your hubby would be with a radical feminist like you! You’ve no idea how much the husbands today sacrifice for the love of their wives, and still get a ’use’ of this act against them...
1 Stars
ARVIND K.PANDEY
PRAYAG, India
Well stated Myth !!
1 Stars
ARVIND K.PANDEY
PRAYAG, India
Very Informative Piece.

There is urgent need to amend this law for sake of Indian fmaily.I wonder will there be a law framed in the same spirit as the one depicted in PWDVA to prevent husbands from cruel wives ?

It’s no secret that number of both cruel wives and harassed husbands is going to increase in future.Are our lawmakers thinking in this direction?
1 Stars
If our lawmakers had the faculty of thinking, then such idiotic anti-constitutional law wouldn’t have passed at all...
2 Stars
”Had men treated women with respect and love in the past, this law wouldn’t have evolved.”

This shows your male-hater attitude. How do you know women were not treated with respect in past? Merely because history does not represent it that way, does not mean it has has not happened.

And why should only men respect women? What about women respecting men?

Now I know how your husband suffers at your hand. He may not express that to you because men are anyways emotionally castrated from the age of 6.

This is the same feeling that stops men’s right from getting propagated. Everytime men speak of their rights, someone talks of some 40 years back, this happened, that happened.

Talk of 2010, goto 1970, talk of 1970, goto 1930 and the vicious circle never ends.

Women in India have been over-pampered since ages and still they keep cribbing and one awareness attempt of men’s rights is mitigated by opposition with statements like,

”Had men treated women with respect in past” bla bla bla.

First of all, no one actually knows what happened in past and even assuming it happened, what authority does one have to punish innocent men of today and spare criminal women?

These double standards are the ones that masculists like us are exposing.

And the days of male-haters are over.
1 Stars
Sweta
Gwalior, India
One: I don't need any tom, dick or harry's opinion on my married life. We are mature enough to handle our relationship and are not at all driven by any 3rd element so you may keep your opinions with yourself for your future or present marriage.

Second: this law must have been framed keeping people like you in mind because i'm sure with this attitude, some day or the other someone out of you will definitely be behind bars.

Third: You know nothing about my family or grandparents so ofcourse you must have mentioned your own family circumstances here. None of our family members have ever been to court or police. We keep the required amount of love and trust in each relation and don't let such situation arise.

Good bye and good luck.
2 Stars
Alright.... here are answers to your comments above.

One: There was no suggestion given by virag. It is a fact that your husband is suffering at your hands. you say you people talk but the point is who talks and who listens???? and who makes the other listen???

Second: We have been behind the bars and are very proud of it :) We are fighting for democracy in the country and following the foot steps of great great revolutionaries.... we are really really proud of ourselves.

Third: Alright your grandfathers abused your grandmoms & your fathers abuse your mothers(im using plurals keeping in mind both your & your hubby’s side). Go initiate a case against them, you really should, but you wont you would rather ill-treat your husband and other men around you, pamper their wives and tell them that men are for no good and spoil their life too.

now thats some great work you are doing.
Add your Comment